about ncdsv training
publications
A/B/C/D/E/F/G/H/I/J/K/L/M/N/O/P/Q/R/S/T/U/V/W/X/Y/Z



Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana



911 Call is Held as Evidence if Victim Cannot Testify, Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times, New York, NY: June 20, 2006. Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company.

 
911 CALLS BACKED AS EVIDENCE – TAPES CAN PROVIDE HELP IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES, Tracy Johnson, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Seattle, WA: June 20, 2006. Copyright © 1998-2006 Seattle Post-Intelligencer. See Adrian Martell Davis v. Washington and Hershel Hammon v. Indiana.

 
ADRIAN MARTELL DAVIS. V. WASHINGTON AND HERSHEL HAMMON V. INDIANA ~ AMICI CURIAE, National Network to End Domestic Violence, Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, and Legal Momentum, Washington, DC: February 2, 2006.

 
ADRIAN MARTELL DAVIS V. WASHINGTON AND HERSHEL HAMMON V. INDIANA ~ OPINION OF THE COURT, U.S. Supreme Court, Washington, DC: June 19, 2006.

 
Court Rules on the Admissibility of 911 Calls, Statements to Police, Reni Gertner, St. Charles County Business Record, St. Charles, MO: July 6, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Dolan Media Newswires.

 
A Deserved ‘Hear, Hear!’ Goes to Hearsay, Wendy J. Murphy, Boston Herald, Boston, MA: June 27, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Boston Herald and Herald Media.

 
HAMMON V. INDIANA AND DAVIS V. WASHINGTON TALKING POINTS, National Network to End Domestic Violence, Washington, DC: 2006.

 
The “I have an ‘owie’” health care providers’ role after crawford,  Davis & Hammon, Allie Phillips, Update (volume 19, number 4 & 5), National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse, Alexandria, VA: 2006.

 
JUSTICES APPARENTLY SPLIT OVER 911 CALLS, Steve Lash, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Chicago, IL: March 20, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Law Bulletin Publishing Company.

 
JUSTICES WEIGH IF ACCUSERS MUST TESTIFY IN COURT, Charles Lane, The Washington Post, Washington, DC: March 21, 2006. Copyright © 2006 The Washington Post Company.

 
JUSTICES WEIGH IN ON USE OF TAPES AND TRANSCRIPTS, Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times, Washington, DC: March 21, 2006. Copyright © 2006 The New York Times Company.

 
The Luxury of Indecision: Child Forensic Interviews after Davis & Hammon, Allie Phillips, Update (volume 19, number 6), National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse, Alexandria, VA: 2006.

 
Minnesota Court Rules Defendant’s Confrontation Clause Rights Were Not Violated, Michelle Lore, Minnesota Lawyer, Minneapolis, MN: November 27, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Dolan Media Newswires.

 
THE NATION; JUSTICES MAY FURTHER RESTRICT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TESTIMONY, David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times, Washington, DC: March 20, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Los Angeles Times.

 
New & Noteworthy in Victims’ Rights – Davis v. Washington, National Crime Victim Law Institute, Portland, OR: July 2006.

 
An Online Symposium on the Confrontation Clause, First Impressions, Michigan Law Review, University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI.

 
Supreme Court Confronts ‘Testimonial Statements’, David L. Hudson, Jr., ABA Journal, American Bar Association, Chicago, IL: June 27, 2006. Copyright © 2006 ABA Journal.

 
SUPREME COURT RULES 911 TAPES ARE ADMISSIBLE IN LIEU OF WITNESS TESTIMONY, National Network to End Domestic Violence, Washington, DC: June 20, 2006. See Adrian Martell Davis v. Washington and Hershel Hammon v. Indiana.

 
SUPREME COURT RULES PROSECUTORS CAN USE 911 STATEMENTS, Associated Press, The New York Times, Washington, DC: June 19, 2006. Copyright © 2006 Associated Press. See Adrian Martell Davis v. Washington and Hershel Hammon v. Indiana.

 

 

 


Top

links
publications
meeting planning
workplace
911 audio recordings
site map
 

= new content



 
about ncdsv training resources news military