 |
Expert Witness
|
|
CALIFORNIA V. BATES, Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, San Diego, CA: June 24, 2004. In limine motion to exclude and limit defense psychiatric evidence and to conduct pre-testimony hearing.
CRITIQUE OF THE "BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME" MODEL, Mary Ann Dutton, National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women, National Resource Center on Domestic Violence, Harrisburg, PA: revised January 1996.
|
|
DAUBERT QUESTIONS FOR EXPERT WITNESS, National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence, Austin, TX.
|
|
Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Voir Dire Questions, American Prosecutors Research Institute, Alexandria, VA.
|
|
HOW TO QUALIFY AN EXPERT WITNESS ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE / BATTERED WOMEN (excerpt), Model Protocol for Law Enforcement, Prosecutors and Judges for the Investigation, Prosecution and Disposition of Criminal Domestic Violence, Criminal Sexual Conduct and Stalking Crimes (second edition), South Carolina Office of the Attorney General and South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy, Columbia, SC: June 1998.
INTRODUCING EXPERT TESTIMONY TO EXPLAIN VICTIM BEHAVIOR IN SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROSECUTIONS, Jennifer G. Long, National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women, National Resource Center on Domestic Violence, Harrisburg, PA: 2007.
|
|
TESTIFYING ABOUT LETHALITY RISK FACTORS, Southwest Center for Law and Policy, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
TESTIFYING ABOUT SELF-DEFENSE AND PREDOMINANT AGGRESSORS, James G. White, Hallie Bongar White and Jane M. Larrington, Southwest Center for Law and Policy, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
TESTIFYING ABOUT THE DYNAMICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, Southwest Center for Law and Policy, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
TESTIFYING ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN, Southwest Center for Law and Policy, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
UNITED STATES V. DIXON 413 F.3d 520 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. granted, 126 S. Ct. 1139, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006. In support of her duress defense, criminal defendant offers testimony on battered women’s syndrome from Dr. Toby Myers, domestic violence expert. Trial court excludes testimony as irrelevant and jury convicts. Exclusion affirmed. Witness’s testimony went to defendant’s subjective state of mind, whereas test for duress defense is defined objectively, by reference to whether person of reasonable firmness in defendant’s position would have been able to resist engaging in criminal conduct.
|
|
USE OF AND PREPARING FOR EXPERTS IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES: WHY? WHO? WHEN? HOW?, Wendy Patrick Mazzarealla, Esq. and Deborah D. Tucker, October 26, 2005.
|
|
The Use of Expert Witnesses in Cases Involving Sexual Assault, Kimberly A. Lonsway, PhD, San Luis Obispo, CA: March 2005.
|
|
VOIR DIRE AND PROSECUTION TIPS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES, excerpted from The Ending Violence Against Women Training Manual, Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
|
|
VOIR DIRE IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES, Sarah M. Buel, JD, The University of Texas School of Law Domestic Violence Clinic, Austin, TX.
|
|
| |
|
 Top
|
|
|
 = new content
TRAINING OPPORTUNITY: Establishing Expertise as an Ethical Expert Witness, August 14-15, 2008 in Austin, TX |
