AGGRAVATED SENTENCING: BLAKELY V. WASHINGTON: LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS, Jon Wool, State Sentencing and Corrections Policy and Practice Review, Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY: September 2004. Copyright © 2004 Vera Institute of Justice.
AGGRAVATED SENTENCING: BLAKELY V. WASHINGTON: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS, Jon Wool and Don Stemen, State Sentencing and Corrections Policy and Practice Review, Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY: August 2004. Copyright © 2004 Vera Institute of Justice.
BEYOND BLAKELY: IMPLICATIONS OF THE BOOKER DECISION FOR STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS, Jon Wool, State Sentencing and Corrections Policy and Practice Review, Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY: February 2005. Copyright © 2005 Vera Institute of Justice. Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker.
CHAOS OVER SENTENCING GUIDELINES, Join Together Online, Boston, MA: July 16, 2004. Blakely v. Washington.
JURY ROLE IN RAISING SENTENCES AFFIRMED, Charles Lane, The Washington Post, Washington, DC: June 25, 2004. Copyright © 2004 The Washington Post Company. Blakely v. Washington.
AGGRAVATED SENTENCING: BLAKELY V. WASHINGTON: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS, Jon Wool and Don Stemen, State Sentencing and Corrections Policy and Practice Review, Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY: August 2004. Copyright © 2004 Vera Institute of Justice.
BEYOND BLAKELY: IMPLICATIONS OF THE BOOKER DECISION FOR STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS, Jon Wool, State Sentencing and Corrections Policy and Practice Review, Vera Institute of Justice, New York, NY: February 2005. Copyright © 2005 Vera Institute of Justice. Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker.
CHAOS OVER SENTENCING GUIDELINES, Join Together Online, Boston, MA: July 16, 2004. Blakely v. Washington.
JURY ROLE IN RAISING SENTENCES AFFIRMED, Charles Lane, The Washington Post, Washington, DC: June 25, 2004. Copyright © 2004 The Washington Post Company. Blakely v. Washington.